Foreign dignitaries may come to visit the Queen on trips to the UK, but these visits are usually no more than photo opportunities, the Queen has no influence over foreign policy decisions.
The outdated laws reflect how out of touch British Monarchy is. Yes theoretically the house of lords and the monarch are above the house of commons and the PM but that is not the case in practice.
This is utter nonsense. Sons inherit before daughters, even if the daughter is older. Republicans tend to argue the only way to establish what 61 million people think is to ask 61 million people as opposed to cheap media polls.
I for one think a monarch is still a childish game that sucks a society dry of much higher potential for quality of life for the entire population.
Integration and therefore morale in Britain would be much improved with the abolition of the monarchy. This wealth must be returned to the citizens of the country. Many would see it is a ploy to replace the Queen with something more sinister or at the very least empty of meaning.
It would not be welcomed - the national character of England is one very much set in its ways and even the smallest rituals are important.
This may be symbolic but it reinforces the belief in this country that voting wont change anything. The monarchy has no real power The Queen may have the power to sign off all legislation before it becomes law but she does not decide whether or not to pass laws.
The changing guards would probably still continue in a British Republic, as it does in Greece. In addition, Britain has always been a coloniser; it has taken over states and ran their countries. If you choose to holiday in either Tunisia or Morocco, would you really be wooed by Mohammed VI being on the throne?
It would ruin a tradition that many feel is part of their national identity and are comforted by it still being the same. The monarchy is obviously not democratic, the people have no say whatsoever which is unfair, because of the hereditary nature of the monarchy it means that the best person can never be picked for the job.
As argued by Chris Dillow in the Liberal Informer http: The effect on morale.
Most British landmarks has little or no reference to Monarchy, and where they do, there is no credible evidence whatsoever to support the ludicrous claim those tourist came here to catch a glimpse of Liz Windsor peaking out of her curtains.
For many people it is a strong and even an emotive issue, we can take the example of the Save the Pound campaign in reaction to the Euro.The republican movement in Britain has announced it will campaign to make the case for holding a referendum on the future of the British monarchy after the Queen's death.
Should the British Monarchy be Abolished? Essay example - In the Scottish and English monarchies were united and at the beginning of the eighteenth century, the monarchy of the United Kingdom was deprived of the decision-making privilege they once had.
My chosen topic is the issue of whether the British monarchy should be abolished. I believe that it should and I have four main reasons to support my views and I believe that I can persuade royalists that the idea of a monarchy should be abandoned.
The British Monarchy System History Essay. Print Reference this. Disclaimer: British Monarchy System (History and Background) It should not be abolished. It has led to the economic, social and cultural growth of the nation through centuries and thus, should be respected and honored.
Arguments in favour of abolishing the monarchy Over the recent years there have been many debates as to whether the monarchy should be abolished.
The monarchy has been part of the British constitution for centuries and it symbolises the unity and traditional standards of the nation. For the purpose of this essay, I intend to examine the many different arguments both for and against the British monarchy being abolished.
Proponents argue strongly that the monarchy symbolises all that is British throughout Britain and the Commonwealth Realms.Download