Should teenagers be treated as adults in the court of law

Kids today are more sophisticated at a younger age; they understand the implications of violence and how to use violent weapons. They act on emotions or wants, without thinking about their actions completely. In the last decade, virtually every state has made it much easier to try juveniles as adults.

The separate juvenile system was developed both to mitigate these harms and because youth were being preyed upon and "schooled in crime" while in adult prisons. At the end, there is an email address; we invite you to send us your comments.

Our justice system depends upon holding perpetrators responsible for their actions. These new studies have zeroed in on the areas of the brain where impulsivity, risk taking, and poor social judgment are regulated.

I once attended the sentencing of a teenager — Clarence — who had killed a woman — Pauline — who sang in my choir. The fundamental question is, are children capable of understanding the consequences of their actions? The pain and trauma of the girl could not be relieved with the punishment of the accused, but we can save many other females of our society from that particular accused.

As people, they are still active works in progress. Wednesday, year-old Nathaniel Brazill was found guilty of second-degree murder for killing his English teacher last year.

The only slight glimmer of hope was that Clarence might, while incarcerated, grow up and become a law-abiding adult and that we would not collectively make him worse than when he went in.

The trouble is that the valve has both expanded and lost its spring. If teenagers are adult enough to do such crime then they are adult enough to be punished for that crime. In one study, teenagers ages 15 to 16 were far more likely, compared with young adults 18 to 26, to confess to a mock crime when presented with false evidence of their guilt.

Their desire for peer approval can shape their behavioral decisions even without direct coercion. Below, a few of the arguments posited by both sides of the juvenile crime debate. If you commit a terrible crime, you will spend a considerable part of your life in jail.

In that age they lack the ability to decide what is right and what is wrong for them. Trying children as adults has coincided with lower rates of juvenile crimes. It is not just brain or lobe size that matters.

The adolescent brain is immature in precisely the areas that regulate the behaviors that typify adolescents who break the law.

In one study, Dr. And several states changed the rules to make juvenile offenders show why they should not be transferred.

Hence they should not be treated with any harsh punishment rather be given a chance to rehabilitate and motivate them to take the right path.

Hence should be punished accordingly. The answer to this dilemma is neither surgical exclusions by legislators from juvenile court nor unregulated prosecutorial discretion to get maximum punishments. Adolescents typically overstate rewards and underestimate risks. Jay Giedd, a neurologist at the National Institute of Mental Health, used this type of MRI to track the individual brains of children and adolescents over a year period into young adulthood.

A young person released from juvenile prison is far less likely to commit a crime than someone coming out of an adult facility. A person should be judged by the extent of crime he has committed.Learning Objectives.

This is an intermediate level course.

After completing this course, mental health professionals will be able to: Briefly discuss the history and prevalence of ADHD in adults. Should Juveniles Be Tried as Adults?. An opinion piece by Professor Terry Maroney. and saying so doesn’t make it so. Besides, we don’t really mean it: When we try them in criminal court, we don’t deem them adults for other purposes, such as voting and drinking.

Terry A.

Juvenile rapists should be treated same as adults

Maroney joined the Vanderbilt Law faculty as assistant. Why Are Children Treated Differently in Criminal Law? Was there always a distinction between children/adults in the criminal court system?

What are the actual differences in treatment and under what authority does the judge have the right to declare a minor as an adult for the purposes of a trial?”. The idea that children should be. Sep 30,  · By the time adolescents become adults, they are accustomed to such inconsistent treatment.

Practically from puberty, young people are bombarded with.

Should the Law Treat Kids and Adults Differently?

jung und frei filed october 23, united states court of appeals for the third circuit. no. united states of america. v. various articles of merchandise. Juvenile rapists should be treated same as adults in the court of law A juvenile is a person who is below the age of 18 years.

Adolescents, Maturity, And The Law

The recent Delhi gang rape accused was a minor and was the most ferocious out of all, has enticed everybody’s attention.

Should teenagers be treated as adults in the court of law
Rated 3/5 based on 56 review