Most theories we look at in this class will have plenty of readily identifiable, important similarities. Remember, however, that the paper is not just a list of points. Many of you made very high-altitude and general criticisms but struggled especially given the space constraints to grapple with specific aspects of an argument.
Your conclusion here is a bookend, bringing up the same or at least a similar point as the one you began with concerning the different kinds of attraction that exist.
The point is not primarily about equality or the like. Cut out the fluff, unimportant illustrations, or side tangents.
At each stage, however, ask yourself —how does this support my argument? Transition language needs to be accompanied by explicitly tying together or explaining the relationship between the different sections of the paper. Your three points of criticism build very well on each other, and you end with a satisfying resolution.
As discussed in the assignment, a critical part of your argument is exploring a counterargument. Importantly, you build in very plausible objections to your claims and then seek to respond to those objections. Citing is not just good academic etiquette or helpful to the reader, but it keeps you honest, holds you accountable to the text.
Doing so within the word limit and doing it well deserves recognition. Another common and related approach was to give a paragraph by paragraph regurgitation of the text. You can almost always avoid a gendered pronoun e. Say what needs to be said to inform your reader and set him up for your own argument.
This does not meet the specifications of the assignment. Using sexist language is simply unprofessional and stylistically immature.
A common logical problem is to assume that if two positions or theories have a number of important, identifiable similarities, then they must be compatible or largely the same.
I hope this is helpful to you as you begin work on your next papers.My Students Need Trigger Warnings—and Professors Do, Too These are also the moments that Coyne moves swiftly by in an otherwise powerful argument for the pitfalls of trigger warnings. High schoolers’ assignment: Present argument in favor of the Holocaust To make sure no other student would be asked to argue in favor of killing Jews again.
The College Fix Original. The Consortium presents counter-arguments in favor of RTI and against PSW models. PDF: A Response to the Learning Disabilities Association of America (LDA) White Paper on Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) Identification».
Multiple Choice Quiz: 1. The authors use the welfare reform and the states case study to illustrate: Which of the following is an argument in FAVOR of federalism? The national government should be given more power to control what states do with grant money.
A Klan group formed as an interfraternity society in included student body the power of the argument in favor of removing segregationist names and replacing them with others who made.
May 17, · Great Debate: Developing Argumentation Skills. By Sandhya Nankani and Holly Epstein Ojalvo students consider the characteristics of effective debate and learn about various formats. They then engage in debates about controversial issues in the news and/or curriculum and conclude by writing evaluations.
Summarize the argument.Download